Skip to main content

eval-when

eval-when Special Operator

Syntax:

eval-when ({situation}*) {form}* → {result}*

Arguments and Values:

situation—One of the symbols :compile-toplevel, :load-toplevel, :execute, compile, load, or eval. The use of eval, compile, and load is deprecated.

forms—an implicit progn.

results—the values of the forms if they are executed, or nil if they are not.

Description:

The body of an eval-when form is processed as an implicit progn, but only in the situations listed.

The use of the situations :compile-toplevel (or compile) and :load-toplevel (or load) controls whether and when evaluation occurs when eval-when appears as a top level form in code processed by compile-file. See Section 3.2.3 (File Compilation).

The use of the situation :execute (or eval) controls whether evaluation occurs for other eval-when forms; that is, those that are not top level forms, or those in code processed by eval or compile. If the :execute situation is specified in such a form, then the body forms are processed as an implicit progn; otherwise, the eval-when form returns nil.

eval-when normally appears as a top level form, but it is meaningful for it to appear as a non-top-level form. However, the compile-time side effects described in Section 3.2 (Compilation) only take place when eval-when appears as a top level form.

Examples:

One example of the use of **eval-when** is that for the compiler to be able to read a file properly when it uses user-defined *reader macros*, it is necessary to write 
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
**eval-when**
(set-macro-character #\$ #’(lambda (stream char)
(declare (ignore char))
(list ’dollar (read stream))))) → T
This causes the call to **set-macro-character** to be executed in the compiler’s execution environment, thereby modifying its reader syntax table.
;;; The EVAL-WHEN in this case is not at toplevel, so only the :EXECUTE
;;; keyword is considered. At compile time, this has no effect.
;;; At load time (if the LET is at toplevel), or at execution time
;;; (if the LET is embedded in some other form which does not execute
;;; until later) this sets (SYMBOL-FUNCTION ’FOO1) to a function which
;;; returns 1.
(let ((x 1))
(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel :compile-toplevel)
(setf (symbol-function ’foo1) #’(lambda () x))))
;;; If this expression occurs at the toplevel of a file to be compiled,
;;; it has BOTH a compile time AND a load-time effect of setting
;;; (SYMBOL-FUNCTION ’FOO2) to a function which returns 2.
(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel :compile-toplevel)
(let ((x 2))
(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel :compile-toplevel)
(setf (symbol-function ’foo2) #’(lambda () x)))))
;;; If this expression occurs at the toplevel of a file to be compiled,
;;; it has BOTH a compile time AND a load-time effect of setting the
;;; function cell of FOO3 to a function which returns 3.
(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel :compile-toplevel)
(setf (symbol-function ’foo3) #’(lambda () 3)))
;;; #4: This always does nothing. It simply returns NIL.
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
(print ’foo4)))
;;; If this form occurs at toplevel of a file to be compiled, FOO5 is
;;; printed at compile time. If this form occurs in a non-top-level
;;; position, nothing is printed at compile time. Regardless of context,
;;; nothing is ever printed at load time or execution time.
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
(eval-when (:execute)
(print ’foo5)))
;;; If this form occurs at toplevel of a file to be compiled, FOO6 is
;;; printed at compile time. If this form occurs in a non-top-level
**eval-when**
;;; position, nothing is printed at compile time. Regardless of context,
;;; nothing is ever printed at load time or execution time.
(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel)
(eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
(print ’foo6)))

See Also:

compile-file, Section 3.2 (Compilation)

Notes:

The following effects are logical consequences of the definition of eval-when:

Execution of a single eval-when expression executes the body code at most once.

• Macros intended for use in top level forms should be written so that side-effects are done by the forms in the macro expansion. The macro-expander itself should not do the side-effects.

For example:

Wrong:

(defmacro foo ()

(really-foo)

‘(really-foo))

Right:

(defmacro foo ()

‘(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :execute :load-toplevel) (really-foo)))

Adherence to this convention means that such macros behave intuitively when appearing as non-top-level forms.

Placing a variable binding around an eval-when reliably captures the binding because the compile-time-too mode cannot occur (i.e., introducing a variable binding means that the eval-when is not a top level form). For example,

(let ((x 3))

(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel :compile-toplevel) (print x)))

prints 3 at execution (i.e., load) time, and does not print anything at compile time. This is important so that expansions of defun and defmacro can be done in terms of eval-when and can correctly capture the lexical environment.

(defun bar (x) (defun foo () (+ x 3)))

(defun bar (x)

(progn (eval-when (:compile-toplevel)

(compiler::notice-function-definition ’foo ’(x)))

(eval-when (:execute :load-toplevel)

(setf (symbol-function ’foo) #’(lambda () (+ x 3))))))

which would be treated by the above rules the same as

(defun bar (x)

(setf (symbol-function ’foo) #’(lambda () (+ x 3))))

when the definition of bar is not a top level form.

Expanded Reference: eval-when

tip

TODO: Please contribute to this page by adding explanations and examples

(eval-when )